SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1953 Supreme(Pat) 124

MISRA
Ugrah Dusadh – Appellant
Versus
Inderdayal Singh – Respondent


Judgment

Misra, J.

1. This is a defendants appeal arising out of a suit by the plaintiff-respondent for recovery of a sum of Rs. 496/- as principal and Rs. 178-8-0 as interest, on the basis of a hand-note dated 27-12-1942.

2. It was alleged that the defendant borrowed the sum under the hand-note with promise to pay the same on demand along with interest at the rate of Rs. 12/- per cent. per annum.

3. Defence case was that the hand-note was forged and fabricated. The plaintiff was a dealer in kerosene oil and was the secretary of the Cane-growers Co-operative Society, and it was in that, capacity that he obtained a number of blank pieces of paper with the defendants thumb-mark thereon and he suspected that plaintiff converted on a of these pieces of paper into a regular hand-note on which he based a false and fraudulent claim, further plea taken was that the plaintiff was a regular money-lender, and under Sec. 4, Bihar Money Lenders (Regulation of Transactions) Act (7 of 1939) he could not recover the amount, if any, advanced by him as he was not a registered money-lender.

4. The learned Munsif held that the hand-note was genuine, but the plaintiff was not a registered money-lender,









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top