MISRA
Ugrah Dusadh – Appellant
Versus
Inderdayal Singh – Respondent
Misra, J.
1. This is a defendants appeal arising out of a suit by the plaintiff-respondent for recovery of a sum of Rs. 496/- as principal and Rs. 178-8-0 as interest, on the basis of a hand-note dated 27-12-1942.
2. It was alleged that the defendant borrowed the sum under the hand-note with promise to pay the same on demand along with interest at the rate of Rs. 12/- per cent. per annum.
3. Defence case was that the hand-note was forged and fabricated. The plaintiff was a dealer in kerosene oil and was the secretary of the Cane-growers Co-operative Society, and it was in that, capacity that he obtained a number of blank pieces of paper with the defendants thumb-mark thereon and he suspected that plaintiff converted on a of these pieces of paper into a regular hand-note on which he based a false and fraudulent claim, further plea taken was that the plaintiff was a regular money-lender, and under Sec. 4, Bihar Money Lenders (Regulation of Transactions) Act (7 of 1939) he could not recover the amount, if any, advanced by him as he was not a registered money-lender.
4. The learned Munsif held that the hand-note was genuine, but the plaintiff was not a registered money-lender,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.