SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1954 Supreme(Pat) 126

PATNA HIGH COURT
S.K.Das and Narayan JJ.
Arjun Prasad
Versus
Central Bank Of India
Letter Patent Appeal No. 5 of 1954 ;
Decided On : NOVEMBER 08, 1954

A transaction of the kind which we are considering here is a mortgage and not a pledge; in its true nature and effect the transaction was a transfer of the whole legal interest in the share to the Bank.

Headnote:

COMPANIES ACT - TRANSFER OF SHARES - MORTGAGE OR PLEDGE - DISTINCTION - BLANK TRANSFER - AUTHORITY TO FILL UP - REGISTRATION - EQUITABLE MORTGAGE - ORDER OF COURT - DISCRETION - SECTION 227(2), COMPANIES ACT.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners held a large number of shares in the Gaya Sugar Mills, Limited. Sometime in 1947, four thousand seven hundred, and seventy-six shares of Rs. 100 each and thirty-three thousand one hundred and forty shares of Rs. 10 each of the Gaya Sugar Mills, Limited in the names of the aforesaid four persons were deposited by Lala Gurasharan Lal with the Central Bank of India as security for payment of a debt of Rs. 8,83,000.00 and odd. At the time of the deposit, Messrs. Arjun Prasad and Lala Gurusharan Lal & the two ladies executed transfers in blank in favour of the Central Bank. On 16-5-1951 there was an application for winding up, and on, 14-11-51 was an order for winding up of the Gaya Sugar Mills, Limited.

Finding of the Court:

The transaction in question was a mortgage and not a pledge; in its true nature and effect the transaction was a transfer of the whole legal interest in the share to the Bank.

Issues: 1. Whether the transaction in question was a pledge or a mortgage? 2. Whether the Central Bank of India had a valid legal title thereto? 3. Whether the Bank was entitled to fill in the blank transfers and to apply before the Official Liquidator to have their names entered in the register in place of the petitioners for the shares in question? 4. Whether the order of Imam J. (as he then was) dated 7-8-1953 is a correct order?

Ratio Decidendi: 1. A mortgage conveys the whole legal interest in the chattels; a pledge conveys only a special property, leaving the general property in the pledger or pawnor; the pledgee or pawnee never has the absolute ownership of the goods, but has a special property in them coupled with a power of selling and transferring them to a purchaser on default of payment at the stipulated time, if any, or at a reasonable time after demand and non-payment if no time for payment is agreed upon. 2. Where under the articles of association of the company a transfer of shares may be made by an instrument in writing, the share-holder may sign a blank transfer and hand it over to a purchaser or mortgagee with authority the holder of it for the time being to fill in the name of the transferee; and such a transfer when filled up can be sent in for registration, and no objection can be raised by the company to its validity. 3. The Bank had the right to perfect their title by filling up the blank transfers, and this they did before they asked for registration. They, therefore, had a completely valid legal title at the time when they asked for registration, and neither the registered owner of the shares nor any person deriving title from the registered owner, could defeat the right of the Bank. 4. The order of Imam J. (as he then was) dated 7-8-1953 is a correct order.

Final Decision: The appeal fails and is dismissed with costs; we assess the hearing fee at Rs. 200.00 only to be paid by the appellants to the respondent Bank.

Judgment

Das, J.

1. This is an appeal from order No. 96 dated 22-1-1954 made by a learned single Judge of this Court in Companies Act Case No. 3 of 1951. The order was made on two petitions filed in the said case, one by Mr. Arjun Prasad and the other by his father Lala Gurusharan Lal, his mother Srimati Pankaj Devi, and his wife Srimati Madhurbhashini Devi.

2. The aforesaid four persons held a large number of shares in the Gaya Sugar Mills, Limited. Sometime in 1947, four thousand seven hundred, and seventy-six shares of Rs. 100 each and thirty-three thousand one hundred and forty shares of Rs. 10 each of the Gaya Sugar Mills, Limited in the names of the aforesaid four persons were deposited by Lala Gurasharan Lal with the Central Bank of India as security for payment of a debt of Rs. 8,83,000.00 and odd.

At the time of the deposit, Messrs. Arjun Prasad and Lala Gurusharan Lal & the two ladies executed transfers in blank in favour of the Central Bank. On 16-5-1951 there was an application for winding up, and on, 14-11-51 was an order for winding up of the Gaya Sugar Mills, Limited.On 29-7-1952, the Central Bank of India, Limited, wrote to Lala Gurusharan Lal to the effect that the latter had an overdraft account amounting to Rs. 6,10,885/- up to 10-6-1952, and against the said overdraft account the Bank held as security a number of shares of various companies, the market value of which was not sufficient to cover the said overdraft; the Bank, therefore, called upon Lala Gurusharan Lal to liquidate the overdraft account, and added that if the overdraft amount together with interest up to date was nut paid on or before 11-8-1952, the, Bank would proceed at their option to sell the shares held by them as security.

Sometimes in July, 1952, Mr. Arjun Prasad made an application for the approval of a scheme of re construction of the Company. This application was heard on 6-10-1953 and an order was passed for calling meetings of the share-holders and of the creditors in accordance with Sec.153, Companies Act and the meetings were to be held on 9th and 10th November 1953.

Sometime before this, however, on 20-7-1953, the Central Bank of India sent to the Official Liquitiator of the Gaya Sugar Mills, Limited, the share certificates in question together with the transfer deeds duly filled in, the transferee being the Central Bank of India, Limited and the date of transfer being the 2nd and 3rd February 1951. The Bank asked the Official Liquidator to get the-shares registered in the name of the Bank. On 6-8-1953, the Official Liquidator submitted a report to the learned Judge hearing Companies Act cases. In this report, the Official Liquidator said: "I have received from the Central Bank of India, Calcutta and Patna, seven applications for transfer of shares of the Gaya Sugar Mills Ltd., accompanied by the relevant share certificates and transfer deeds duly completed in all respects from the transferees. These transfer deeds are of a date prior to the petition for winding up. I have examined them and they appear to be bone fide.... It is therefore, prayed that your Lordships will be pleased to give me sanction to do all acts and things as may be necessary in respect of the said transfers and to permit me to affix the companys seal in relation to the said share certificates were required, or pass such other orders as may in the premises be deemed just and proper."

This report was considered by his Lordship Imam J. (as he then was) on 7-8-1953. On that date the following order was passed:

"Read the report of the Official Liquidator under Sec.227(2), Companies Act. It appears that the transfers in these cases took place before the order of winding up. The prayer of the Official Liquidator to the following effect is allowed. He is given sanction to do all acts and things as may be necessary in respect of the said transfers and is permitted to affix the Companys seal in relation to the said share certificates where required. These shares are to


































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top