SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(All) 427

MEHROTRA
Shankatha Prasad Verma – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner, Banaras Division – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Jagdish Sahai, For the Appellant /

JUDGMENT

Mehrotra, J. - This is an application under Article 226 of the Constitution praying that an order passed by the President, Municipal Board, Ramnagar, dated 12-1-1956 terminating the Petitioner's services be quashed.

2. The facts which are set out in the affidavit and which in essentials have not been controverted are that the Petitioner applied for the post of the Secretary, Ramnagar Municipal Board, as the post was advertised. The Petitioner was appointed to that post by the Municipal Board of Ramnagar by its resolution No. 75 dated 2-5-1954 which was subsequently clarified by another resolution of 21-6-1954. After the Board had approved his appointment by that resolution the resolution had to be sent to the Commissioner u/s 66 of the U.P. Municipalities Act and the Commissioner, Banaras Division, by his letter dated 16-9-1954 approved the appointment of the Petitioner to that post. There is some controversy between the parties as regards the interpretation of the approval given by the Commissioner which I shall deal with when dealing with the points raised by the Petitioner. The Petitioner however did not possess any riding certificate and under the approval order passed b

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top