AHMAD
Jamadar Mian – Appellant
Versus
Amir Hassan – Respondent
Ahmad, J.
1. This appeal is by the plaintiffs, who are two in number. Plaintiff No. 2 is the widow of one Taiyab Mian of village Mohammadpur and is the mother of, plaintiff No. 1. The appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated the 30th June, 1950, passed by the 1st Additional subordinate Judge, Chapra, affirming the decision in the suit given on 23rd December, 1948, by the Munsif, 2nd Court, Siwan. It arises out of a suit for redemption of zarpeshgi deed dated the 15th June 1919, executed for a sun) of Rs. 399/- by plaintiff No. 2 for self and as guardian of her minor son Khodadin in favour of defendant No. 1 and one Lalmohammad, who subsequently assigned his interest to defendant No. 2, whose name is also Lal Mohammad and who is the sala of defendant No. 1. The property mortgaged therein was 3 bighas 7 khatas and 9 dhurs of kasht land which originally belonged to Taiyab Mian. It appears that Taiyab Mian died leaving his widow (plaintiff No. 2) and his son Khodadin. Subsequently after his death plaintiff No. 2 got another posthumous son (plaintiff No. 1).
Thereafter her first son Khodadin died issueless leaving his mother and his brother plaintiff No. 1 as his
Mt. Shamrati Kuer V/s. Kalika Singh
Pichai Pillai V/s. Lingam Iyer
Tripura Sundaramma V/s. Secretary Of State
Kameshwar Prasad V/s. Meghan Garain
Ananda Prasad V/s. Ambik Prasad
Arunachallam Chetty V/s. Venkatachalapathi
Daivasikhamani Ponnambala Deisikar V/s. Periyanan Chetti
Ejas Ali V/s. Court Of Wards, Balarampur Estate
Ghulam Mohammad V/s. Ghulam Husain
Hardit Singh V/s. Gurumukh Singh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.