SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1955 Supreme(Pat) 88

KANHAIYA SINGH, S.K.DAS
Commissioner Of Income Tax, B. & O. – Appellant
Versus
Janki Kuar Sahiba – Respondent


Judgment

Kanhaiya Singh, J.

1. This case came before us on a case stated by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Patna Branch, under Sec. 66(1), Income-tax Act, 1922, on the application of the Commissioner of Income-tax, Bihar and Orissa. The assessee was the then owner of the Bettiah estate and submitted a return with respect to the forest produce for the assessment year 1948-49, corresponding to the accounting year 1947-48. The assessee owns some forest and derives income from the sale of forest produce.

The assessment was made under S, 12, Income-tax Act, as income falling under head (v) of Sec. 6 of the Act, namely, income from other sources. For the assessment year 1948-49 the assessee returned a net income of Rs. 1,66,675/- from the sale of forest produce. The gross receipt from the sale of forest produce amounted to Rs. 2,59,521/-The assessee claimed a deduction therefrom of a sum of Rs. 90,846/- as expenditure incurred solely for the purpose of earning the income from forests.

It included a sum of Rs. 21,554/- representing cess paid by the assessee which has been described by the Appellate Tribunal at Jungle cess. This jungle cess is levied under Sec. 6, Bengal Cess Act of 188

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top