SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(Pat) 40

KANHAIYA SINGH, RAI
Jatu Das – Appellant
Versus
Mt. Sulochana Mundain – Respondent


Judgment

Kanhaiya Singh, J.

1. This is an appeal by the plaintiffs from the decree dated 5-3-1949, of Mr. B. S. Tripathi, Additional Subordinate Judge, affirming the decree dated 24-7-1948, of Mr. M. M. Sahay Munsif. The suit was brought by the plaintiffs as raiyats for eviction of the defendants from 1,66 acres of land comprised in khata No, 12 in village Idalhatu substantially on the ground that the defendants were under-raiyats and had refused to vacate the land and give the plaintiffs khas possession even on service of notice to quit.

The defendants resisted the suit on the ground that they had acquired permanent occupancy right in the suit land by adverse possession. Their additional plea was that the suit was incompetent as they had not been given any notice to quit the land.

2. The learned Munsif held that the defendants had not acquired any occupancy. right in the suit land. He further held that the question of acquisition of any tenancy right in the land by adverse possession did not arise as the defendants in the capacity of under-tenants could not prescribe against the landlord. He further found that there was no demand for possession, and after so holding he dismissed th
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top