SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(Pat) 192

KANHAIYA SINGH
Union Of India – Appellant
Versus
Shamsuddin Waizuddin – Respondent


Judgment

Kanhaiya Singh, J.

1. This is a second appeal by the Union of India arising out of a suit for compensation for loss of consignment. The facts are these : A consignment of two cases of Agarbatti was booked by the Modern Indian Trading Company at a station called Jaswantpur on the Mysore Railway for despatch to the plaintiff firm which was the consignee deliverable at Patna Junction station which is on the Eastern Railway (formerly East Indian Railway). The consignment was not delivered to the plaintiff. After certain correspondence the plaintiff instituted the present suit for recovery of Rs. 651-8-0 on account of loss of the goods on the allegations that in spite of the protracted correspondence and also service of notice under Section 77 of the Indian Railways Act and Section 80 of the Code of Civil Procedure, their claim remained unsatisfied.

2. The consignment had to pass through several railways, viz., the Mysore Railway, the Southern Railway, B.N. Railway and the East Indian Railway. But the plaintiff sued only the East Indian Railway through the Union of India. The other Railways were not impleaded as defendants.

3. The Union of India representing the East Indian Rail



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top