SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(Pat) 128

K.SAHAI
In Re – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

K.Sahai, J.

1. The question which arises for consideration in this case is whether this Court should order the winding up of a Bank named Chotanagpur Banking Association Ltd. (hereinafter to be referred to as the Bank) or direct that the scheme of composition put up by the Bank under Sec.391 of the Companies Act, 1956, be considered by the creditors and share-holders of the Bank at meetings to be held for the purpose.

2. The Bank filed an application in this Court on 6-1-1958, praying for an order of moratorium under Sec.37 of the Banking Companies Act (X of 1949), It was not accompanied with a report from the Reserve Bank as required by Sub-section (2) of the section. Acting under the proviso to that sub-section, however, I granted moratorium and called for a report from the Reserve Bank on the affairs of this Bank. By my order dated 14-1-1958, I appointed a Special Officer to take over charge of the assets of the Bank.

In accordance with my order, the Reserve "Bank submitted a report dated the 14th March, stating that there was no reasonable chance of the Bank paying its debts within the period of six months beyond which the order of moratorium could not last. On the 17th


































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top