PATNA HIGH COURT
V.Ramaswami and R.K.Choudhary JJ.
Dipendra Nath Sarkar
Versus
State Of Bihar Through The Secy.Education Dept
Miscellaneous Judicial Case No. 358 of 1960 ;
Decided On : NOVEMBER 08, 1960
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA - ARTICLE 30 - MINORITY RIGHTS - ESTABLISHMENT AND ADMINISTRATION OF EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS - INTERFERENCE BY STATE GOVERNMENT - UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
Fact of the Case:
The Bankipore Brahmo Samaj (Samaj), a minority based on religion, established and administered the Bankipore Balika Vidyalaya (Vidyalaya), a High School. The State Government, through resolutions, attempted to reconstitute the Managing Committee of the Vidyalaya in accordance with its own rules, which were later incorporated into the Bihar High Schools (Control and Regulation of Administration) Act, 1960.
Finding of the Court:
The Court held that the Vidyalaya was established and administered by the Samaj, which had the fundamental right to do so under Article 30 of the Constitution. The State Government's resolutions and the impugned order were unconstitutional, void, and inoperative as they infringed the Samaj's right to administer the Vidyalaya.
Issues: 1. Whether the Vidyalaya was established and administered by the Samaj. 2. Whether the State Government's resolutions and the impugned order infringed the Samaj's right to administer the Vidyalaya under Article 30 of the Constitution.
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The Court relied on the evidence on record, including the constitution of the Vidyalaya, the appointment of the Managing Committee by the Samaj, and the recognition granted by the Board of Secondary Education, to conclude that the Vidyalaya was established and administered by the Samaj. 2. The Court held that Article 30 of the Constitution guarantees the right of minorities to establish and administer educational institutions of their choice. The State Government's resolutions and the impugned order, which sought to reconstitute the Managing Committee of the Vidyalaya in accordance with its own rules, infringed this right and were, therefore, unconstitutional.
Final Decision: The Court allowed the petition and issued a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents not to give effect to the impugned order.
Choudhary, J.
1. This application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been presented by the Honorary Joint Secretary of the Bankipore Brahmo Samaj (hereinafter to be referred to as the Samaj) as authorised by it by a resolution dated the ist of May, 1960, which is annexure X to the petition. The petitioner has prayed for issue of a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents to cancel the order contained in their letter No. 7863-64, dated the 11th of April, 1960 and to forbear from giving any effect to the said order or to any other orders passed in pursuance of the Government Resolutions, dated the 28th of September, 1954 and the 7th of May, 1956. Rule was issued by this Court to the respondents to show cause as to why a writ of mandamus, as stated above, should not be issued against them.
Respondent No. 1 is the State of Bihar through the Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, and respondent No. 2 is the Secretary of the Board of Secondary Education, Bihar. Cause has been shown by respondent No. 2 through the Government Pleader by filing a counter-affidavit sworn in on the 9th of September, 1960 (hereinafter to be referred to as the first affidavit). A reply to that counter-affidavit (hereinafter to be referred to as the first reply) was filed on the 15th of September, 1960; and, on the same day, a further affidavit was filed on behalf of respondent No. 2 through the Government Pleader (hereinafter to be referred to as the (second affidavit). The case was taken up for hearing on that very date, that is, the 15th of September 1960, when the Government Pleader drew our attention to a report of the Special Board and to a letter, dated the 7th of April, 1945, from the Secretary, Board of Secondary Education, Bihar to the Inspectress of Schools, Bihar. Since they were not on the records of the case, we adjourned the case for enabling the Government Pleader to put them on the records of the case with a proper affidavit. Consequently, those documents were put on record with an affidavit sworn in on the 16th of September, 1960 (hereinafter to be referred to as the third affidavit). The petitioner, thereafter, filed an affidavit in reply (hereinafter to be referred to as the second reply), and the further hearing of the case was concluded thereafter.
2. On a perusal of the petition, the different affidavits, counter-affidavits and the replies thereto, the facts of the case, stated briefly, appear to be as follows :
3. The Samaj is the Patna Branch of the Brahmo Samaj, which is a comparatively small but well-known religious community of persons professing the Brahmo faith. The Brahmo religion is distinct and separate from Hinduism and other religions with a separate church and with doctrines and tenets and rites and practices of its own. The Samaj has a place of worship known as "The Bankipore Brahmo Samaj Mandir", and the affairs and the properties of the Samaj have all along been managed by an Executive Committee elected from time to time by the General Committee, which consists of the entire congregation of the Brahmos at Patna. It is undisputedly a . minority, based on religion, within the meaning of Article 30 of the Constitution of India. In about 1930, the Samaj conceived the idea of starting a Girls School, and formed a provisional committee for drawing up a scheme at a meeting of the Executive Committee of the Samaj, dated the 22nd of October, 1930. A scheme was drawn up by the said provisional committee, and it was approved at a General Meeting of the Samaj held on the 3oth of November, 1930, and it was resolved that a Girls School be established to be named as the Bankipore Balika Vidyalaya (hereinafter to be referred to as the Vidyalaya) and a Managing Committee was appointed by the Samaj for the year 1931. Accordingly, .the Vidyalaya was established, with subscriptions of the members of the Samaj, in a building situated at Khazanchi Road, and it was opened on the 7th of December, 1930
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.