SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(Pat) 198

S.P.SINGH, RAMRATNA SINGH
Bhola Prasad Chaudhary – Appellant
Versus
Guru Prasad Sah – Respondent


Judgment

RAMRATNA SINGH, J.

1. The petitioners were convicted by a Magistrate of Sahibganj under Sec. 342 of the Penal Code; petitioner No. 1 was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for nine months and to pay a fine of Rs. 200/-, or in default to undergo further rigorous imprisonment for three months; petitioner No. 2 was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months and petitioner No. 3 was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one month only. On appeal by the petitioners, their convictions and sentences were upheld by the Sessions Judge of the Santal Parganas.

2. The facts as found by the courts below are these. Petitioner Bhola Prasad Chaudhary is the Sarpanch and petitioner Charan Napit is the Chief Officer of the village volunteer force of Rakshi Gram Panchayat constituted under the Bihar Panchayat Raj Act, 1947. Petitioner Abdul Jabbar is the Chaukidar of village Raksi. On Wednesday the 22nd October 1958 at about 8 a.m. petitioners Bhola Chaudhary and Jabbar went to the house of opposite party Guru Prasad Sah and asked him to go to the house of the Mukhiya of the Gram Panchayat. As Guru Prasad was taking meal then he promised to go to the Mukhiyas





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top