SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(Pat) 129

RAJ KISHORE PRASAD
Bhim Mandal – Appellant
Versus
Magaram Corain – Respondent


Judgment

Raj Kishore Prasad, J.

1. This appeal by defendant 1 is from a judgment of affirmance decreeing the plaintiffs suit.

2. The facts are simple, and may, briefly, be stated as below :

3. On the 24th October 1942, the plaintiff is alleged to have sold the land in suit to defendant 1, appellant, under a registered sale deed, Ext. A, for a sum of Rs. 99/-. The plaintiff, thereafter, brought a suit, out of which the present appeal arises, on the 29th June, 1954, for a declaration that at the time of the execution of the impugned sale deed, Ext. A, he was a minor, being then only 17 years 5 months old, and, therefore, it was void and it conferred no title on the defendants.

(3a) The suit was contested by the defendant-appellant, according to whom, the plaintiff on the day of execution of the disputed sale deed, Ext. A, was aged 24 to 25 years, and, not 17 years 5 months, as alleged by him, and the sale was valid.

4. On a consideration of the evidence both oral and documentary, both the courts below concurrently held that the plaintiff was a minor at the time of the execution of the impugned sale deed, Ext. A, and, therefore it was void, and, as such, the defendant did not acquire a













































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top