SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(Pat) 93

RAJ KISHORE PRASAD
Sohan Mushar And Others – Appellant
Versus
Kailash Singh – Respondent


Judgment

1. This is a reference under S. 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which for the sake of brevity will be referred to hereinafter as the Code, by the then Additional Sessions Judge, Motihari, for setting aside the order of November 8, 1960, passed, by a 1st class Magistrate of Bettiah, under Section 145 of the Code, declaring only Kailash Singh, one of the opposite party here, to be in possession of the land in dispute.

2. The grounds given by the learned Judge, in his letter of reference, for quashing the impugned order, are, first, that the affidavits have not been considered, and, secondly, that the Magistrate has confused between right to possess, and, actual physical possession, and has not kept in view the principle laid down by a Full Bench of this Court in S. M. Yaqub v. T. N. Basu, AIR 1949 Pat 146 (FB) at p. 162.

3. In support of the first ground of the reference, Mr. Purnendu Narayan relied on two decisions of Sahai, J. sitting singly in Jamilur Rahman v. Abdul Aziz, 1960 BLJR 179 : (AIR 1960 Pat 240) and Rudra Singh v. Bimla Debi, 1960 BLJR 328 : (AIR 1960 Pat 505).

4. Sub-section (1) of Section 145, which deals with the procedure where dispute concerning lan























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top