SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(Pat) 39

KANHAIYA SINGH, V.RAMASWAMI, K.SAHAI
Hindustan Construction Company – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

1. In the suit out of which this appeal arises the plaintiff alleged that the State of Bihar required bricks, Jhama and brickbats for the construction of (1) Muzaffarpur-Hajipur Road, (2) Muzaffar-Border Champaran-Sagauli Road, (3) Buildings at Muzaffarpur, (4) Buildings at Darbhanga, and (5) Buildings at Lohata (Motihar). The plaintiff offered tenders in response to the notification by the Public Works Department for supply of bricks etc. for the execution of the aforesaid schemes. The tenders of the plaintiff were accepted and accordingly bricks were laid and the necessary process for the supply of materials was taken in hand by the plaintiff. It is said that one of the terms of the contract between the parties was that the Public Works Department would arrange for the supply of the proper quantity of coal for burning the bricks in various kilns. The defendant, however, failed to fulfil this part of the contract with regard to the supply of the requisite quantity of coal. As a result of this the bricks were not burnt and a huge quantity of imburnt bricks was damaged and destroyed by the rains which caused considerable loss to the plaintiff. The plaintiff, therefore, broug















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top