SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1963 Supreme(Pat) 13

ANANT SINGH, S.C.MISRA
Hindustan Construction Company – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

Anant Singh, J.

1. The plaintiff is the appellant, it is a registered firm known as "Hindustan Construction Company" with the head quarter at Sarayaganj in the town of Muzaffarpur. It was doing business at the relevant time in the manufacture and supply of bricks. The defendant-respondent is the State of Bihar.

2. The suit, giving rise to this appeal, was instituted by the plaintiff for recovery of a sum of Rs. 3,14,756/14/2 including interest from the defendant as damages and compensation for breach of contracts.

3. The State of Bihar, acting through the Public Works Department, required several lakhs of bricks, brickbats ana Jhamas, hereinafter to be referred to only as "the bricks", for some projects in the Muzaffarpur Division and Champaran Division, both controlled by one Superintending Engineer in the North Bihar Circle. The bricks were required in connection with the constructions of (1) Muzaffarpur-Hajipur Road, (2). Muzaffarpur Border Champaran-sagauli Road, (3) Buildings at Muzaffarpur, (4) Buildings at Darbhanga and (5) Buildings at Lohata in Motihari during the seasons of 1945-46 and 1946-47. Tenders were called for on behalf of the defendant through the proper

































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top