PATNA HIGH COURT
Anant Singh and G.N.Prasad JJ.
State Of Bihar
Versus
Ram Chandra Prasad Sharma
Decided On : JANUARY 23, 1963
INDIAN ELECTRICITY ACT, 1910 - SECTION 39 - THEFT OF ELECTRICAL ENERGY - DISHONEST ABSTRACTION, CONSUMPTION OR USER OF ENERGY - EXISTENCE OF ARTIFICIAL MEANS OF ABSTRACTION - PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE OF DISHONEST ABSTRACTION - BURDEN OF PROOF - CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE - PRESUMPTION OF THEFT - REBUTTAL.
Fact of the Case:
The case involved four separate trials where the accused were charged with offenses under Sections 39 and 44 of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910, and Rule 138 read with Rule 56 of the Indian Electricity Rules. The charges stemmed from alleged tampering with electricity meters to steal energy.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the prosecution had established beyond reasonable doubt that the meters in question had been tampered with, resulting in the dishonest abstraction of electrical energy. The court held that the existence of artificial means of abstraction, such as broken seals and inserted wires, constituted prima facie evidence of dishonest abstraction under Section 39 of the Act.
Issues: 1. Whether the prosecution had proven the existence of artificial means of abstraction of electrical energy. 2. Whether the existence of artificial means of abstraction constituted prima facie evidence of dishonest abstraction under Section 39 of the Act. 3. Whether the accused had rebutted the presumption of theft arising from the existence of artificial means of abstraction.
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court held that the prosecution had adduced sufficient evidence, including testimonies of witnesses, contemporaneous materials, and the tampered meters themselves, to establish the existence of artificial means of abstraction in the meters of the four industrial installations in question. 2. The court interpreted Section 39 of the Act to mean that the existence of artificial means of abstraction is prima facie evidence of dishonest abstraction, consumption, or user of energy, and that such dishonest abstraction constitutes theft within the meaning of the Indian Penal Code. 3. The court held that the accused had failed to bring forth any material to rebut the presumption of theft arising from the existence of artificial means of abstraction. The court reasoned that the accused, as the consumers in custody or control of the meters, stood to gain from the dishonest abstraction of electrical energy and that the circumstantial evidence, including the tampering with the meters, was incompatible with their innocence.
Final Decision: The court set aside the acquittal of the accused under Section 39 of the Act and restored the conviction and sentence imposed by the trial court. The court also upheld the convictions of the accused under Section 44 of the Act and Rule 138 read with Rule 56 of the Rules.
G.N.Prasad, J.
1. These appeals and revisions involve similar questions of law and fact, and they have been heard together with the consent of the parties and for the sake of convenience. They arise out of four separate trials, in each of which the charges framed against the various accused persons were mainly for offences under Sections 39 and 44 of the Indian Electricity Act (Act X of 1910), 1910 (hereafter to be referred to as the Act) and Rule 138 read with Rule 56 of the Indian Electricity Rules (hereafter to be referred to as the Rules) framed by the Central Electricity Board under Section 37 of the Act.
2. All the four prosecutions were launched on different dates in June and July, 1958, at the instance of the Chief Engineer of the Patna Electric Supply Company Limited, who at the relevant time, was Sri B.S. Ramaswami, and in the following circumstances:
3. The Patna Electric Supply Company Limited (hereinafter to be referred to as the PESCO) generates electrical energy and also purchases such energy from the Bihar State Electricity Board. The total quantity of the energy so generated and purchased by the PESCO came to about forty lacs units per month in 1958. In that year the PESCO supplied electrical energy to about 20,000 consumers in Patna, Patna City and Dinapur, about 900 of whom were industrial power consumers. under Section 26. of the Act read with Rule 57 of the Rules, the PESCO was under a duty to supply to their consumers what are known as "correct meters", that is to say, meters capable of recording consumption of electrical energy within a limited margin of error, not exceeding three per cent, above or below absolute accuracy, at all loads in excess of l/10th of full load and up to full load. Rule 57(2) of the Rules lays down that no meter shall register at no load, The system followed by the PESCO was to test the meter before its installation in the premises of its consumers, with a view to ensure that it was capable of recording consumption within the margin of error permissible under Rule 5/. Only such meters used to be supplied to the consumers which passed the above test.
4. It is necessary to have some idea of the mechanism of a meter. Inside the meter there is a disc, which rotates when the current passes through the meter and the consumption of energy is registered by a set of dials. The outer cover of a meter is known as the meter cover. It is designed to prevent the free movement of the disc or the dials from being obstructed or interfered with by any artificial means or device from outside. Every meter has 4 nuts, two on each side of it, with corresponding stud holes through which the meter cover can be fixed, and after placing the meter cover in position, the nuts of each of the four stud holes are tightened up fully. When fully tightened up, stud holes are blocked completely by the lower projection of the stud nuts, thus not permitting anything, not even dust or moisture, to pass inside the meter. Each stud and each nut has a hole in it, which is meant for sealing the meter. For the purpose of sealing the meter, a piece of wire has to be passed through the stud hole and the corresponding nut on each side. Then the wife is twisted, and one end of it is passed through the holes of the opposite stud and nut, and the same end of the wire is then joined with the loose end of it and twisted. Thereafter both the ends are sealed together by means of special kind of lead, seals. So long as the wires and seals are intact, the nuts cannot be screwed up or loosened and, therefore, the stud holes cannot be exposed. In order to expose the stud-hole of a sealed meter, it would be necessary first to break the seal and to take out the sealing wire after untwisting it, and then to take it out from the holes of the nut and the stud. Thereafter, the nut can be screwed up or loosened, thereby exposing the stud-hole. Once the stud-hole is exposed, it is possible to insert a wire, or dust or moisture, inside
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.