SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(Pat) 26

R.J.BAHADUR, S.C.MISRA
Yugal Kishore Sinha – Appellant
Versus
Nagendra Prasad Yadav – Respondent


Judgment

R.J.Bahadur, J.

1. This is an appeal under Sec.116-A of the Representation of the People- Act, 1951, (hereinafter to be referred to as the Act) by Yugal Kishore Sinha, who was the petitioner before the Election Tribunal Darbhanga, and had asked it to declare the election of the respondent, Nagendra Prasad Yadav, to the Lok Sabha from the 12th Sitamarhi Parliamentary constituency as void.

2. Besides the appellant and the respondent there were five other candidates, who had filed nomination papers to fill the said seat and the respondent was declared elected from the above mentioned constituency on the 1st March, 1962. The appellant thereafter submitted a petition before the Election Tribunal challenging the election of the respondent on two grounds. The first ground was that the respondent held benami in the name of his wife Smt. Vidyabati Debi a stage carriage permit No. 190/60 under the North Bihar Regional Transport Authority for plying a bus on Muzaffar-pur-Sitamarhi-Sursand route. It was said that this was "an office of profit" under the State Government and since the respondent was the real holder of the said office he was disqualified to be a member of the Lok Sabha u
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top