A.B.N.SINHA
Jaggernath Singh – Appellant
Versus
Narayan Sarogi – Respondent
1. This appeal by the defendant arises out of a suit for recovery of Rs. 4096/-, principal and interest, which was decreed in full by the trial court and only in part by the lower appellate court.
2. According to the plaintiffs case, the defendant was the Munim of his firm and in that capacity an amount of Rs. 3411/- had been entrusted to him on the 19th February, 1953 for the purpose of making payment of Rs. 3200/ to a firm known as Chaman Lal Haridwari Lal at Banares and utilising the balance of Rs. 211/- for making certain purchases and meeting the expenses of travelling to and back from Benares. It was alleged that the defendant, instead of paying the sum of Rs. 3200.00 to Chaman Lal Haridwari Lal and making the purchase etc., which he had been instructed to do, absconded with the money and never returned to the plaintiff, whereupon the plaintiff filed a criminal case which had ultimately ended in the acquittal of the defendant. On these allegations, the plaintiff instituted the suit for recovery of Rs. 3411/- as principal--the money which had been entrusted to him--and Rs. 685/- as interest from the 19th February, 1953, the date on which the aforesaid amount of Rs. 341
Andhra Bank Ltd. V/s. Srinivasan
Bengal Nagpur Rly. Co. Ltd. V/s. Ruttanji Ramji
Mahabir Prasad V/s. Durga Dutta
Rameshwar Prasad V/s. Shambehari Lal Jagannath
Trojan And Co. V/s. Nagappa Chettiar
Union Of India V/s. A.L. Rallia Ram
Union Of India V/s. Ram Charan
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.