SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(Pat) 152

A.B.N.SINHA
Jaggernath Singh – Appellant
Versus
Narayan Sarogi – Respondent


Judgment

1. This appeal by the defendant arises out of a suit for recovery of Rs. 4096/-, principal and interest, which was decreed in full by the trial court and only in part by the lower appellate court.

2. According to the plaintiffs case, the defendant was the Munim of his firm and in that capacity an amount of Rs. 3411/- had been entrusted to him on the 19th February, 1953 for the purpose of making payment of Rs. 3200/ to a firm known as Chaman Lal Haridwari Lal at Banares and utilising the balance of Rs. 211/- for making certain purchases and meeting the expenses of travelling to and back from Benares. It was alleged that the defendant, instead of paying the sum of Rs. 3200.00 to Chaman Lal Haridwari Lal and making the purchase etc., which he had been instructed to do, absconded with the money and never returned to the plaintiff, whereupon the plaintiff filed a criminal case which had ultimately ended in the acquittal of the defendant. On these allegations, the plaintiff instituted the suit for recovery of Rs. 3411/- as principal--the money which had been entrusted to him--and Rs. 685/- as interest from the 19th February, 1953, the date on which the aforesaid amount of Rs. 341
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top