SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(Pat) 49

TARKESHWAR NATH, RAMRATNA SINGH
State Of Bihar – Appellant
Versus
Sakaldip Singh – Respondent


Judgment

Tarkeshwar Nath, J.

1. This appeal under Sub-section (1) of Sec. 417 of the Code of Criminal Procedure by the State of Bihar is directed against the judgment acquitting the respondents in respect of the various charges framed against them

2. The case of the prosecution was that Gudar Singh (P W. 1) had purchased a house from Musammat Dhaneshar Kuer (P. W. 14), the widow of Rambhaju Singh on the 20th June 1960 by a sale-deed (Ex 2), and after the purchase. Gudar Singh came in possession of that house. On the 27th January 1962, Gudar Singh was sitting in the Sahan of that house, hut, at about 2 P.M., these respondents turned up variously armed and Girija Singh (respondent No. 2) ordered the other respondents to break the lock of the eastern door and enter that house Respondents Sakaldip Singh and Girija Singh were armed with pistols, respondent Deosharan Singh had a Bhala, respondent Ram Lakshman Singh had a lathi, whereas, the remaining respondents, namely, Lakshman Sao and Barho Singh had pharsas Gudar Singh made a protest, but Sakaldip Singh Fired his pistol. Rambrichh Choukidar (P. W. 9) had arrived there and the smoke coming out of the pistol fired by Sakaldip Singh affe






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top