SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(Pat) 34

M.P.VARMA
Suggi Bind And Another – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

1. A limited rule was issued by this Court in this case on the question of sentence only. While dealing with this aspect of the matter, the entire evidence has been placed before me. Both the petitioners have been found guilty of an offence under sec. 457, Indian Penal Code, and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months each. They were also found guilty under sec. 380, Indian Penal Code, and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months each. For the offence under Sec. 457, Indian Penal Code, each of them has further been fined a sum of Rs. 200, or in default, to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one month. The petitioners were, first, tried by the Munsif-Magistrate of Arrah, who passed the above mentioned order of conviction. Then there was an appeal and the learned second Assistant Sessions Judge of Arrah has upheld that order.

2. The facts of the case leading to the present revision may be summarised as under. In the night intervening between the 23rd and the 24th day of September, 1965, Manna Bind (P. W. 1), who is the informant in this case, was sleeping in his house with his wife Rupa (P. W. 2). This house is situated within the town of Arra






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top