K.B.N.SINGH, ANWAR AHMAD
Daitari Mahto – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent
ANWAR AHMAD, J.
1. The petitioner was convicted under S.16(1) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, hereinafter referred to as the Act, and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for six months. On appeal, his conviction and sentence have been upheld by the Additional Sessions Judge, Singhbhum.
2. The prosecution case in that the Food Inspector (P.W. 2) of the District Board of Singhbhum visited the shop of the petitioner on the 7th November 1963 along with Hari Har Bhattacharya (P.W. 1), Mata Karwa (P.W. 3) and one Abhay (not examined), purchased one and a half pao of gunja oil from the petitioner on payment of price, divided it into three equal parts, put them in three separate bottles and, after affixing labels thereof, properly packed and sealed them. One of the bottles was given to the petitioner and one was sent to the Public Analyst, who, in his report, found the sample of gunja oil highly adulterated with linseed oil.
3. The prosecution of the petitioner was started on the basis of a complaint (Ext. 7) made by P.W. 2 after obtaining the necessary sanction as required by S.20 of the Act.
4. The taking of the sample and the fact that it was found to be highly
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.