SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(Pat) 28

SHIVESHWAR PRASAD SINHA, SHAMBHU PRASAD SINGH
Union Of India – Appellant
Versus
Garbhu Sao – Respondent


Judgment

Shambhu Prasad Singh, J.

1. This appeal by the Union of India as owner, the Eastern Railway and Northern Railway administrations, defendant first party to the suit, is directed against a money decree for compensation for nondelivery of 11 bags of yellow mustard seeds weighing 925 kilograms (it is so mentioned in the railway receipt, Ext. 1, and wrongly stated as 9.25 kilograms both in the plaint as well as in the judgments of the Courts below) booked from Bindki Town Out Agency to Patna City by defendant No. 3 and consigned to self. The case of the plaintiff-respondent was the defendant No. 3 consigned the said 11 bags of mustard seeds for sale in, plaintiffs gaddi and endorsed the railway receipt in Favour of the plaintiffs concern. The plaintiff paid Rs. 708.72 paise including miscellaneous expenses to Allahabad Bank, Patna, and got the railway receipt, though the value of the consignment was Rs. 991-64 P. per bijak, the rest being payable after sale of the commodity to defendant No. 3. The said consignment was not delivered to the plaintiff in spite of correspondence and notices under Section 77 of the Indian Railways Act and Section 80 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Th









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top