SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1974 Supreme(Pat) 224

NAGENDRA PRASAD SINGH, S.SARWAR ALI
Ram Nagina Singh – Appellant
Versus
S. V. Sohni And, Others – Respondent


Judgment

SARWAR ALI, J.

1. These three writ applications have been heard together and will be governed by a common judgment. In these writ applications prayers have been made for issue of a writ in the nature of quo warranto as also prohibition. During the course of argument, however, it was rightly conceded that the writ of prohibition will not be attracted. That is so because no judicial or quasi-judicial order or proceeding is challenged in these writ applications. The substantial prayer, therefore, is with respect to issue of a writ in the nature of quo warranto as against respondent No. 1. Substantially therefore, the appointment of respondent No. 1 as Lokayukta is under challenge.

2. The law making provision for the appointment, and laying down function, of the Lokayukta was for the first time made by promulgation of Bihar Lokayukta Ordinance, 1973 being Ordinance No. 3 of 1973. The Ordinance was signed on 12-1-1973 by the then Governor and published in the Bihar Gazette on 18-1-1973. No action was taken in pursuance of the Ordinance. On 14-3-1973 a bill in terms of Ordinance was introduced in the Bihar Legislative Council. On 8-4-1973 the first Ordinance lapsed. Hence necessi































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top