SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(Pat) 182

SHAMBHU PRASAD SINGH, S.ALI AHMAD
Arjun Ho – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner, Chotanagpur Division, Ranchi – Respondent


Judgment

1. This writ application has been filed for quashing orders contained in Annexures 1 and 3 to it. Annexure 1 is an order of Additional Deputy Commissioner, Singhbhum (respondent No. 2) decreeing Kolhan Title Suit No. 43 of 1966 filed by respondents Nos. 3 to 7 in terms of the award of the panches to whom the dispute had been referred. Annexure 3 is the order of the Commissioner of Chotanagpur (respondent No. 1) dismissing the appeal of the petitioners from the aforesaid Judgment of respondent No. 2.

2. The entire ordersheet of the suit has been filed as Annexure 4 along with the rejoinder filed by the petitioners to the counter-affidavit of respondent No. 2. As it appears from the ordersheet, the suit was for declaration of plaintiffs title to the lands described in Schedule C to the plaint and for confirmation of the same or in the alternative, for partition of the lands described in Schedule B half and half by metes and bounds. The suit was valued at Rs, 3,000.00 for the purposes of jurisdiction, but only a consolidated Court-fee of Rs. 22.50 was paid. It was filed before respondent No. 2 on 5th of September, 1966. After the plaint was filed the Additional Deputy Commissi
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top