SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(Pat) 66

S.N.P.SINGH, S.K.JHA
Binod Kumar Dugar – Appellant
Versus
Superintendent Of Police And Registering Authority – Respondent


Judgment

S.K.JHA, J.

1. In all these applications under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India are involved common questions of law arising from, more or less identical facts. Hence, they have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.

2. The petitioners of all these writ applications are owners of trucks bearing various registration marks which are not material for the disposal of these cases. The grievance of all of them is against the issuance of notice to them by the Motor Vehicles Inspector (respondent No. 2), as incorporated in Annexure 1 to each of the writ applications and the final orders passed by the Superintendent of Police and Registering Authority under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 (respondent No. 1), as incorporated in Annexure 3 to each of these applications. A prayer has been made for the issuance of an appropriate writ quashing Annexures 1 and 3 aforesaid.

3. The facts are not at all in controversy. From the petitions and the counter-affidavits filed on behalf of the respondents emerge these basic facts. The petitioners goods vehicles, otherwise called trucks, were registered under Sec.24 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 (herei




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top