S.N.P.SINGH, S.K.JHA
Binod Kumar Dugar – Appellant
Versus
Superintendent Of Police And Registering Authority – Respondent
S.K.JHA, J.
1. In all these applications under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India are involved common questions of law arising from, more or less identical facts. Hence, they have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.
2. The petitioners of all these writ applications are owners of trucks bearing various registration marks which are not material for the disposal of these cases. The grievance of all of them is against the issuance of notice to them by the Motor Vehicles Inspector (respondent No. 2), as incorporated in Annexure 1 to each of the writ applications and the final orders passed by the Superintendent of Police and Registering Authority under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 (respondent No. 1), as incorporated in Annexure 3 to each of these applications. A prayer has been made for the issuance of an appropriate writ quashing Annexures 1 and 3 aforesaid.
3. The facts are not at all in controversy. From the petitions and the counter-affidavits filed on behalf of the respondents emerge these basic facts. The petitioners goods vehicles, otherwise called trucks, were registered under Sec.24 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 (herei
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.