SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(Pat) 107

B.D.SINGH, MUNESHWARI SAHAY
Tipan Raut – Appellant
Versus
Raj Kumar Singh – Respondent


Judgment

1. This application under Sec.115 of the Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter referred to as the Code) by Tipan Raut, who was the plaintiff in the trial Court, is directed against the order dated the 16th January, 1974, pass-ed by the Munsif of Patna in Title Suit No. 36 of 1968, refusing to convert the petitioners suit into a proceeding under Sec. 47 of the Code.

2. This application came up for decision before L. M. Sharma, J., who, by an order dated the 27th February, 1975, was pleased to refer it to a Division Bench, and this is how it has come be-fore us for disposal.

3. In order to appreciate the points involved in this application, it will be necessary to state some material facts. The petitioner instituted the said Title Suit on the 17th February, 1968. It will be relevant to quote in extenso the Eng-lish rendering of the statements of the petitioner in Paragraphs Nos. 3, 4 and 5 of the plaint:-

"3. That no notice under Order XXI Rule 22 (C. P. C.) was, by any means, sent to the plaintiff, nor was the same served upon him. And likewise, neither processes for attachment; nor proclamation for sale was served on the spot. All the proceedings including that for fixation


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top