SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(Pat) 104

M.P.SINGH, S.SARWAR ALI, S.K.JHA
Raj Kumar Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Uchit Narain Singh – Respondent


Judgment

S.K.JHA, J.

1. This is an appeal by the plaintiff landlord against a judgement and decree of reversal. The appellant instituted the suit, out of which this appeal arises, on the 10th of Feb., 1968, for eviction of the tenant respondent from the building let out to the latter. The suit was brought under the provisions of Sec.11 of the Bihar Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act 1947 (Bihar Act 3 of 1947) hereinafter to be referred to as the Rent Act. It may not be out of place to mention here that the Rent Act ceased to have any force after the 31st of March, 1976, but Bihar Act 16 of 1977 has been given retrospective effect from the 1st of April, 1976. The provisions of the Rent Act have been, for all material purposes, perpetuated up to the 31st March, 1981.

2. The appellant had got a decree for eviction in his favour in the trial court. The court of appeal below however, has reversed the decree and dismissed the appellants suit.

3. The appeal involves some interesting, although vexed, questions of law. The learned single Judge, before whom the appeal was initially placed for hearing, referred it to a Division Bench. When it came to be heard by two of the learne









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top