SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(Pat) 211

PATNA HIGH COURT
K.B.N.Singh and P.S.Sahay JJ.
Kamakhya Narain Singh
Versus
State Of Bihar
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 3302 of 1979 ;
Decided On : OCTOBER 14, 1980

Headnote:Bihar Municipal Corporation Act, 1978 Secs 1(2) & (3), 2(1) Bihar & Orissa Municipal Act 1922, Sec. 4(1)(d)-Power has been given to the State Government to include any area in order to constitute a Corporation may be Municipality, Notified Area Committee joining the area with such area as the State Government may think fit with an urban population of two lacs or more. (Para 4)

       Interpretation of Statute-Excessive delegation-Bihar Municipal Corporation Act, 1978, Sec. 4 - Legislature has to lay down the policy and it may also confer discretion on an administrative agency as to the execution of the policy with power to work the details within the frame work of the policy without altering the essential features of the Act of the legislature - Such direction and details are not bad on theory of excessive legislation. (Paras 9 & 11)

       General Clauses Act Sec. 6 - Repeat by implication - Where two Acts having the same purpose and object the provisions of which cannot work in the same filed leading to anomalies and absurdity the former Act will give way to the subsequent Act meaning thereby that the former Act shall be deemed to be repealed to that extent. [Para 13]

       

Judgment

P.S.SAHAY, J.

1. This application, under Arts. 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, is for quashing the Notification No. 1406 dated 15.09.1979 constituting Ranchi Municipal Corporation and setting out its boundaries, Annexure-3, and Notification No. 1408 of the same date applying certain provisions of the Patna Municipal Corporation Act to the newly formed Ranchi Municipal Corporation, Annexure-1, and also the Notification No. 1532 dated 29.10.1979 by which Hazari Ram Gupta, respondent No. 2, was appointed Administrator, Ranchi Municipal Corporation and also Executive Officer of the Joint Water Works Committee, Ranchi-Doranda, Annexure-2. Here it may be mentioned that subsequently a fresh notification was issued on 29.05.1980, after this writ application was admitted, and Guru Prasad Baidya Jyotishi, Executive Officer, was appointed as Chairman of the Joint Water Board in place of Hazari Ram Gupta.

2. In order to appreciate the points, which have been raised in this application, it will be necessary to state some facts. Under the Bihar and Orissa Municipal Act (hereinafter referred to be as the Municipal Act) two municipalities were functioning; one at Ranchi and the other at Doranda and a Joint Water Works Committee was constituted by the aforesaid municipalities under the provisions of the aforesaid Act and the petitioner was elected as Chairman. In 1975 there was an attempt to remove the petitioner from the post of Chairman and for that a resolution was passed by the Ranchi Municipality and the Executive Officer was made Chairman of the Water Works Committee. The petitioner challenged the same in C.W.J.C. 920 of 1976 and the resolution of the Ranchi Municipality dated 6-11-1975 was quashed. On 24th April, 1978 the Governor of Bihar promulgated an Ordinance, Bihar Ordinance (35 of 1978) (The Bihar Municipal Corporations Ordinance, 1978) which gave power to the State Government to constitute a Corporation in any city having a population of two lacs or more. The said Ordinance was followed by an Act, Bihar Municipal Corporations Act, 1978 (Bihar Act 12 of 1978). On 15-9-1979 there was a notification under S.2 (1) read with Sec.1 (2) and (3) of the Corporation Act establishing Ranchi Municipal Corporation comprising the area falling within Ranchi and Doranda Municipalities and also adding Jagannathpur area. The boundaries of the said Corporation were mentioned in the aforesaid notification, a copy of the same has been filed along with this application, marked as Annexure-3. On the same day there was another notification adopting, restricting and modifying certain provisions of Patna Municipal Corporation Act to the newly created corporation, a copy of the said notification has been filed and marked Annexure-1. Thereafter, by another notification dated 29-10-1979 in exercise of powers conferred under Sec. 546 of the Patna Corporation Act Hazari Ram Gupta, Administrator, was appointed as the Executive Officer of the Joint Water Board, Ranchi and Doranda, a copy of the same has been filed as Annexure-2. By another notification in place of Hazari Ram Gupta, Sri Guru Prasad Baidya Jyotshi was appointed, a copy of the same has been filed as Annexure-2A, and this was stayed. The petitioner has challenged the aforesaid notifications on various grounds.

3. Counter-affidavits have been filed on behalf of the State and respondent No. 2 and also reply thereto denying the assertions made in the petition and justifying the action of the State Government in establishing a Corporation at Ranchi comprising of Ranchi and Doranda Municipalities and also including Jagannathpur area in its fold. In the counter-affidavit of the State it has been asserted that according to the census reports of the year 1971 the population of the area included in Ranchi Corporation is as follows:

Ranchi Municipality 1,75,934

Doranda Municipality 23,954

Jagannathpur Area 55,663

Total 2,55,551

It has also be














































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top