SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(Pat) 165

P.S.SAHAY, K.B.N.SINGH
Bawa Gopal Das Bedi And Sons – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Judgment

Prem Shanker Sahay, J.

1. The petitioners have moved this Court for quashing of the proceedings relating to the search and seizure of their gold ornaments from locker No. 64 of Allahabad Bank, Rajendra Nagar Branch, and for a direction to the respondents to release the aforesaid gold ornaments.

2. Here it will be necessary to state the facts mentioned in the application. Petitioner No. 1, Bawa Gopal Das Bedi and Sons, is a registered partnership firm dealing in the business of gold and petitioners 2 to 4 are its partners The firm is a licensee under the provisions of the Gold (Control) Act, 1968 (hereinafter to be referred as the Act) bearing dealer licence No. 11/63. The firm is also permitted for inter State movement of gold ornaments and sales. A copy of the certificate granted by Assistant Collector, Central Excise, Amritsar, dated 8-3-1973 has been filed and marked as Annexure-1. Under the Gold (Control) Rules (hereinafter to be referred as the Rules) every licensed dealer has to maintain accounts under Rule 11 and the details have to be filled up in form G.S 12. The case of the petitioners, farther, is that some of the petitioners left Amritsar on 3-1-1981 with gold o


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top