UMESH CHANDRA SHARMA
Uma Shankar Bajaj – Appellant
Versus
Narain Das – Respondent
1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 2nd March, 1982 passed by the Subordinate Judge, Patna appointing a Receiver in the suit.
2. The plaintiff instituted the suit impleading the defendants praying for the following reliefs:-
(a) That the partnership be wound up and a decree for dissolution of partnership be passed,
(b) In the event of the Court finding that the partnership had not been dissolved prior to the institution of the suit, it should now be dissolved and a decree for dissolution be passed in accordance therewith,
(c) A decree for a sum of Rs. 52,500.00 be passed in favour of the plaintiff against the defendants, and
(d) Interest pendente lite and future be awarded along with the cost of the suit. It has been stated in rite plaint that the parties to the suit entered into a partnership carrying on a business of eating house, restaurant, serving sweets, etc. under the name and style of "Vrindavan". It was housed in a portion of the building bearing Holding No. 334, Circle No. 6, Ward No. 2 of the Patna Municipal Corporation situate at Dak Bunglow Road, Patna. The agreement was entered into under a deed dated the 5th day of April, 1979. After the said a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.