SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Pat) 65

UMESH CHANDRA SHARMA
Uma Shankar Bajaj – Appellant
Versus
Narain Das – Respondent


Judgment

1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 2nd March, 1982 passed by the Subordinate Judge, Patna appointing a Receiver in the suit.

2. The plaintiff instituted the suit impleading the defendants praying for the following reliefs:-

(a) That the partnership be wound up and a decree for dissolution of partnership be passed,

(b) In the event of the Court finding that the partnership had not been dissolved prior to the institution of the suit, it should now be dissolved and a decree for dissolution be passed in accordance therewith,

(c) A decree for a sum of Rs. 52,500.00 be passed in favour of the plaintiff against the defendants, and

(d) Interest pendente lite and future be awarded along with the cost of the suit. It has been stated in rite plaint that the parties to the suit entered into a partnership carrying on a business of eating house, restaurant, serving sweets, etc. under the name and style of "Vrindavan". It was housed in a portion of the building bearing Holding No. 334, Circle No. 6, Ward No. 2 of the Patna Municipal Corporation situate at Dak Bunglow Road, Patna. The agreement was entered into under a deed dated the 5th day of April, 1979. After the said a

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top