SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Pat) 205

S.K.JHA, ASHWINI KUMAR SINHA
Ranchi Electric Supply Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Of Income Tax – Respondent


Judgment

Ashwini Kumar Sinha, J.

1. These are five reference applications made u/s. 256(1) of the I.T. Act, 1961, bv the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Patna Bench "B".

T.C. No. 21 of 1975.

2. This is a reference application made under Sec.256(1) of the I.T. Act, 1961, by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Patna Bench-A.

3. The assessment years in the first five reference applications involved are 1963-64, 1964-65, 1966-67, 1967-68 and 1968-69 and Taxation Case No. 21 of 1975, the assessment year in question is 1969-70. One identical question of law has been raised in all the assessment years. In Tax Cases Nos. 31 to 35 of 1975 the questions referred to for our opinion are as follows :

"(1) Whether under the provisions of Sec. 43(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the two expressions actual cost and actual cost of the assets to assessee bear the same meaning ?

(2) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was correct in holding that for the assessment years 1963-64, 1964-65, 1966-67, 1967-68 and 1968-69, depreciation and development rebate was allowable on the actual cost of the service lines to the assessee as reduced by the contributions by the consumer


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top