SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Pat) 5

LALIT MOHAN SHARMA, S.S.SANDHAWALIA
Mirza Sulaiman Beg – Appellant
Versus
Harihar Mahto – Respondent


Judgment

S.S.SANDHAWALIA, J.

1. Whether a Kabaristan is within the ambit of the wide sweep of the definition of land in sec. 2(9) of the Bihar Consolidation of Holdings and Prevention of Fragmentation Act, 1956 (hereinafter to be referred to as the Consolidation Act) is the significant question necessitating this reference to the Division Bench.

2. The petitioner, Mirza Sulaiman Beg and others had instituted a Title Suit in their individual as well as representative capacity on behalf of the Muslim public for the alleged removal of encroachment made by the defendants and others over a portion of a Kabaristan situated in Muradabad Kalan and for restraining the defendants from interfering with the land or the trees thereon. It was averred that the aforesaid land is a very old Kabaristan and the dead bodies of the Muslims residing in the localities were being buried therefrom time immemorial. On this premise, it was the stand that the same was not agricultural land within the meaning of the Consolidation Act. In contesting the suit, the defendants in the written statement pleaded, inter alia, that they had taken a settlement of ten decimals out of the disputed plot of land and construc

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top