SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Pat) 109

UDAY SINHA, NAZIR AHMAD
Commissioner Of Wealth Tax – Appellant
Versus
Ramdeo Sachdeo – Respondent


Judgment

Nazir Ahmad, J.

1. A statement of the case has been submitted by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Patna Bench A, Patna, under Sec.27(1) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 (hereinafter to be called as "the Act"), referring the following question of law for the opinion of this court at the instance of the Department :

"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in applying the provisions of the proviso to Sec.14 of the Wealth-tax Act and in holding that the default under Sec.18(1)(a) of the Wealth-tax Act was for a period of four months only ?"

The relevant facts of the case can be culled from the statement of the case. The assessee is an individual. For the assessment year 1969-70, the return of wealth was filed by the assessee on February 23, 1970. The Wealth-tax Officer found that the return was due on June 30, 1969, and so he held that there was a delay of seven months in filing the return. For this delay he started penalty proceedings under Sec.18(1)(a) of the Act. Alter considering the contentions of the assessee, the Wealth-tax Officer passed an order on October 28, 1970, imposing a penalty of Rs. 15,395. A copy of the order of th














































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top