SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Pat) 232

UDAY SINHA, NAZIR AHMAD, S.S.SANDHAWALIA
Commissioner Of Income Tax – Appellant
Versus
Sheo Kumari Debi – Respondent


Judgment

S.S.Sandhawalia, J.

1. Whether the limitation provision of Sec.149 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, envisages the issuance of a notice only, or its actual service subsequently on the assessee as well, is the intricate and significant question necessitating this reference to a Full Bench. Particularly in issue is the correctness of the view enunciated by the Full Bench on this point in Jai Hanuman Trading Co. Pvt. Ltd. V/s. CIT [1977] 110 ITR 36 (P & H).

2. The assessment year in this reference was way back 1961-62. The Revenue being of the opinion that substantial income has escaped assessment initiated proceedings under Sections 147 and 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter to be referred to as "the Act"). For that purpose, a notice for reassessment to the assessee which was actually signed on March 30, 1970, was admittedly issued by registered post on March 31, 1970. Though the precise date of its service is not on the record, it is common ground that the said notice was served later in the first week of April, 1970. The assessee raised objection that the notice, though issued within the period of limitation but having not been served within eight years from the end of























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top