HARISH CHANDRA, V.S.DESHPANDE
NEW BANK OF INDIA LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
INCOME TAX OFFICER – Respondent
( 1 ) GENERAL OBSERVATIONS. The immediate context of the consideration of this writ petition is the issue of notice to the petitioner assessee by its Income-tax Officer under section 148 (1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act), because he had "reason to believe" within the meaning of section 147 of the said Act that the income of the assessee had escaped assessment. The petitioner challenges the validity of this notice on the ground that no material existed on which the Income-tax Officer could have reason to believe that its income had escaped assessment and consequently the notice was issued without jurisdiction. The Income-tax authorities have raised the preliminary objection that the writ petition is not maintainable because appeals would lie under section 246 against the order of reassessment made under section 147 and as this remedy is provided for by the Income-tax Act the present writ petition for the redress of any injury or alleged injury suffered by the petitioner by the issue of the notice, which may subsequently lead to orders of reassessment, cannot be entertained in view of the existing clause (3) of Article 226. But clause (3) of Article 226 of
S. Narayanappa and Others v. Commissioner of Income tax Bangalore
Commissioner of Income tax v. A. Raman and Company
Kantamani Venkata Narayana and Sons v. First Additional income tax Officer, Rajahmundry
Barium Chemicals Ltd. and another v. Compay Law Board and Others
Rohtas Industries Ltd. v. S. D. Agarwal and another
Rampur Distillery and Chemical Company Ltd. v. Company Law Board
Income tax Officer v. Lakhmani Mewal Das
Delhi Development Authority v. Smt. Lila D. Bhagat and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.