SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Pat) 380

ASHWINI KUMAR SINHA, S.S.SANDHAWALIA
Dhaka Singh – Appellant
Versus
Baleshwar Prasad Singh – Respondent


Judgment

ASHWINI KUMAR SINHA, J.

1. This Second Appeal by the plain tiff is against a judgement of reversal.

2. The only significant question involved in this second appeal is whether S.43 of the, Bihar Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling Area and Acquisition of Surplus Land) Act, 1961 (shortly known as the Bihar Land Ceiling. Act) was a bar to the jurisdiction of the Civil Court to maintain the suit.

3. On 13-9-1966 a Ceiling Case No. 6 of 1966-67 was filed under S.16(3) of the Bihar Land Ceiling Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) by the intervenor-defendants of the suit in question. Admittedly in that Ceiling Case the plaintiff-appellant was not a party. But defendants 5 to 8 of the present suit were parties in the Ceiling Case filed by the intervenor-defendants.

The present suit by the plaintiff-appellant was filed the very next day of the filing of Ceiling Case No. 6 of 1966-67 by the intervenor-defendants (claiming pre-emption) i.e. the suit in question was filed on 4-9-1966. The aforesaid case under the Ceiling Act and the suit - both proceeded simultaneously. The case under the Ceiling Act was disposed of by order dt. 13-5-1971 and the suit was decreed on 28-3-1972.

4. Th
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top