SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Pat) 360

SATYESHWAR ROY, S.S.SANDHAWALIA, S.N.JHA
Harihar Prasad Debuka And Etc. – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

S.S.SANDHAWALIA, J.

1. The significant issue that emerges for adjudication in this reference to the Full Bench is whether the Notification No. S.O. 1432, dt. 28th Nov., 1985, issued in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-Sec. (2a) of S.31 of the Bihar Finance Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) prescribing the declaration form to be carried on a goods carrier or a vessel for transporting goods through the State of Bihar during the course of inter-State trade, is violative of the freedom of trade guaranteed by Arts.301 and 304 of the Constitution ? Equally at issue is a minor cleavage of judicial opinion within this Court betwixt two Division Bench orders passed at the motion stage.

2. In the context of the aforesaid pristinely legal question, the facts inevitably pale into relative insignificance. These may, therefore, be briefly noticed from Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 990 of 1986 (R). The petitioner therein is the proprietor of M/s. Jai Durga Industries - a firm which regularly imparts foodgrains from other States to its business premises situated at Jamshedpur. The said firm is registered under the Bihar Sales Tax Act as well as under the Central Sales Tax






















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top