SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Pat) 6

S.S.SANDHAWALIA, NAGENDRA PRASAD SINGH, S.N.JHA
Syed Zafrul Hassan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

S.S.SANDHAWALIA, J.

1. Whether S. 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 envisages the grant of anticipatory bail by any High Court or any Court of Session within the country, irrespective of the locale of the commission of the offence, has come to be the larger question before this Full Bench.

2. The matrix of facts giving rise to the issue deserves only a brief notice. Syed Zafrul Hassan and Prasanta Majumdar, the two petitioners, are employees of the Associated Cement Company Ltd. and claim to be the Dealing Assistant and the Head of the Section respectively in the Branch Office of the said company at Patna. At the instance of M. P. K. Kurup, Executive Engineer, a case under Ss. 467/468/471/420/120B of the Indian Penal Code against them has been registered in the Jhinkpani Police Station, District Singhbhum, on the 18th of July, 1985 with regard to the supply of 800 metric tons of cement by the said company to the Government. It is unnecessary to recount the details of the allegations in the first information report, and it suffices that apprehending the arrest in pursuance thereof the petitioners have moved the present criminal miscellaneous petition.

3. At the mot


































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top