SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Pat) 84

UDAY SINHA, NAZIR AHMAD
Commissioner Of Wealth Tax – Appellant
Versus
Panna Devi Dalmia – Respondent


Judgment

1. This is a reference under Sec.27(1) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 (hereinafter called "the Act"). The question referred for our opinion is whether a cold storage is "an industrial undertaking" and reads as follows :

"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was correct in law in holding that cold storage is also a plant and comes under an industrial undertaking and is entitled to statutory exemption as provided under Sec. 5(1)(xxxii) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 ?"

2. In this reference, we are concerned with the assessment year 1973-74, The assessee is an individual. She (for, the assessee is a lady) had invested large amount in a firm, M/s Vishnu Cold Storage. The value of her holdings was to the tune of Rs. 1,50,000. The Wealth-tax Officer intended to include the value of her holdings in the cold storage for the purpose of reckoning her liability under the Act. The assessee contended that her interest in the cold storage was not liable to be included in terms of Sec. 5(1)(xxxii) of the Act. The Wealth-tax Officer rejected her claim. She, however, succeeded before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner and the Appellate Tribunal. Hence, the re
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top