SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Pat) 385

S.B.SINHA
Sayeed Abdul Wahab – Appellant
Versus
Mohd. Sakman Alias Lokman – Respondent


Judgment

S.B.Sinha, J.

1. This Second Appeal out of a judgment and decree dated 24-9-1979 passed by Shree Prabhat Kumar Sinha, First Additional Subordinate Judge, Hazaribagh in Title Appeal No. 39/3 of 1979/79, whereby and whereunder the said learned Court reversed the judgment and decree dated 13-4-1979 passed by Shree Uma Shanker Prasad in Title Suit No. 1 of 1978 dismissing the plaintiff-respondents suit.

2. By an order dated 5-2-1981 the following substantial question of law was formulated.--

Whether the defendant-appellant was a defaulter within the meaning of Section 12(1)(d) of the Bihar Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1977 and liable to be evicted from the suit premises?

3. Mr. B.K. Dey, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant, sought permission to raise another substantial question of law in this Second Appeal which is in the following terms:

Whether the judgment passed by the learned lower appellate Court while reversing the judgment and decree passed by the learned trial Court committed a serious error of law as it while doing so did not assign any cogent reason so far as the issue relating to relationship of landlord and tenant?

4. Having h















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top