SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Pat) 298

BISHESHWAR PRASAD SINGH, SATYESHWAR ROY
Haldhar Prasad Singh – Appellant
Versus
Giridih Municipality – Respondent


Judgment

1. In this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing annexure 2, resolution dt. 29-3-1982 of respondent No. 1 by which respondent 5 said to be junior to the petitioner has been promoted to the post of Lower Division Clerk (L.D.C. for short) with effect from 1-4-1982.

2. Petitioner, a matriculate, was appointed as tax collector by respondent 1 and he joined on 10-12-1967. Respondent 5, a matriculate, was appointed as a conservancy assistant by respondent 1 and he joined on 2-3-1973.

3. According to the petitioner the tax department and the conservancy department are two separate departments in the Giridith Municipality and the posts of L.D.C. and upwards in the ministerial cadre are filled up by promoting the employees of the tax department. If for some reason, it is not found possible to do so, the vacant posts are filled up by promoting the senior most employees of other departments and if no such person is found to be eligible, outsiders are appointed. On the superannuation of the then headclerk, a vancancy arose and consequently vacancy of L.D.C. also in the event the person then holding the post of L.D.C. was promoted to next higher post. The respondent muni









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top