SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Pat) 113

BIMALENDU NARAYAN SINHA, P.S.MISHRA, NAGENDRA PRASAD SINGH
Krishna Bhagwan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

N.P.SINGH, J.

1. The appellant has been convicted under sections 302, 307 and 324 of the Penal Code by the Sessions Judge and has been sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life under sec. 302, ten years under sec. 307 and two years under sec. 324. The sentences have been directed to run concurrently. The appellant is alleged to have committed the offences in question on 8-3-1982. It appears that no plea was taken in the Court below that the appellant was a child within the meaning of the Bihar Children Ordinance /Act on the date of the commission of the offence and as such he should not have been put on trial before the Sessions Judge. This plea was taken for the first time before this Court during the hearing of the appeal. The Bench hearing the appeal has referred the case for consideration of the following questions by a larger Bench.

(i) Whether the provisions of the Bihar Children Act, 1982 shall be applicable even to a case where by the time the trial commences or concludes the accused ceases to be a child although when the offence was committed he was a child within the meaning of the Act ?

(ii) Where the plea that the accused was a child within the meaning of the A














































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top