SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Pat) 303

G.C.BHARUKA, G.G.SOHANI
Shree Ambikaji Rice Mills – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Of Income Tax – Respondent


Judgment

G.C.Bharuka, J.

1. The present case arises out of an order passed by this court under Section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, directing the Tribunal to refer the following question of law for its opinion :

"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in sustaining the addition of Rs. 30,146 in the trading account ?"

2. The assessee is a Hindu undivided family. It has a rice mill and carries on business of milling rice. The present case relates to the assessment year 1974-75. During this assessment year, the assessee disclosed a turnover of Rs. 16,50,076 and gross profit of Rs. 56,571. Since, according to the Income-tax Officer, certain expenses which ought to have been adjusted in the profit and loss account had been wrongly adjusted in the manufacturing/trading account, he readjusted the gross profit at Rs. 39,264. Further, according to the Income-tax Officer, the readjusted gross profit was too low and so, he called for an explanation from the assessee to explain the reasons for the same. According to the assessee, the main reason for the low gross profit was sales of rice effected to the Government as levy at statutorily fix








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top