SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Pat) 463

NAGENDRA PRASAD SINGH, SACHCHIDANAND JHA
Jai Jaiyendra Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Bihar State Electricity Board – Respondent


Judgment

N.P.Singh, J.

1. This writ application has been filed the on behalf of the petitioner for quashing a notification dated 8.10. 1988 passed by the Bihar State Electricity Board (hereinafter) reffered to as the Board) absorbing Sri Arjun Lal, respondent No.3, in the cadre of Deputy Director of Accounts of the Board with effect from 19.8.1983.

2. Petitioner Nos. 1 to 5 and 7 to 9 were promoted from the post of Accounts Officer to the post of Deputy Director of Accounts between 2.5.1986 and 18.3.1988. So far petitioner No. 6 is concerned, he was appointed as Deputy Director of Accounts by process of direct recruitment on 12.8.1986. According to the petitioners, the absorption of the respondent No. 3, from the cadre of Assistant Electrical Engineer (Selection Grade) to the cadre of Deputy Director of Accounts of the Board by the impugned notification is not only against the provisions of the Bihar State Electricity Borard Regulations, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as the Service Regulation) but also affects the seniority of these petitioners. In other words, as petitioners had entered into the cadre of Deputy Director of Accounts on different dates between 2.5.1986 and 18.3.1988,



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top