SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Pat) 369

SATYESHWAR ROY, S.B.SINHA
Mahabir Prasad Jalan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

1. - In this writ application, the petitioners have, inter alia, prayed for a declaration that the provisions of Bihar Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling Area and Acquisition of Surplus Land) Act, 1961 (Bihar Act XII of 1962) as amended by the Bihar Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling Area and Acquisition of Surplus Land) Amendment Ordinance, 1975 (hereinafter called the Ceiling Act) and particularly the provisions for payment of compensation are ultra vires the Constitution of India, illegal, void and of no effect and the same should be set aside.

2. The facts of the matter lie in a very narrow compass. By reason of two registered indentures dated 17/11/1961, the then trustees of a trust known as "Subarnrekha Agricultural Estates" acquired two Tea Estates commonly known as "Palandu Tea Estate" and "Sabaya Tea Estate" together with tea bushes, plantations, standing trees, buildings factory and other properties situate in different villages in the district of Ranchi.

3. According to the petitioners, the tea bushes and the standing trees are very valuable and the petitioners process the tea leaves at its factory for manufacturing and processing. The petitioners allegedly used to




































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top