SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Pat) 188

NAGENDRA RAI, B.N.AGRAWAL
Saresh Singh – Appellant
Versus
Raja Ram Singh – Respondent


Judgment

B. N. Agrawal, J.

1. -this revision application has been filed by the petitioners for setting aside order dated 9-8-1983 passed by the learned Subordinate judge whereby he has rejected the petition filed on behalf of the petitioners for adding them as party-defendants upon the death of Most. Mantora Kuer, defendant No.1.

2. The plaintiff filed a suit for declaration that the decree passed in T. S. No.750 of 1970 was illegal, void and not binding upon the plaintiff The further relief sought for was that the deed of gift dated 23-6-1979 alleged to have been executed by father cf the plaintiff in favour of defendant No.1 was illegal, void and not binding on the plaintiff.

3. During the pendency of the suit, defendant No.1 died and after her death, the plaintiff and other defendants filed a compromise petition in the suit wherein the defendants accepted the claim of the plaintiff. The petitioners filed an application for adding them as party which application, in effect and substance, was an application for substitution. In the said application, it was stated that during her life time, defendant No.1 executed a will on 15-6-1982 in favour of the petitioners. The prayer made on



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top