SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Pat) 431

PATNA HIGH COURT
S.B.Sinha and Narayan Roy JJ.
Najeeb Zaman
Versus
Bihar State Electricity Board
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 2397 of 1993 ;
Decided On : SEPTEMBER 24, 1993

Electrical dues are personal dues of the consumer and the same does not run with the electrical connection.

Headnote:

ELECTRICITY - FRESH CONNECTION - GRANT - CONDITIONS - LEGALITY - Bihar State Electricity Board - Fresh Electrical Connection - Conditions Precedent - Legality - Held, a distinction has to be made between an application for re-connection and an application for grant of fresh connection by a person - Respondents have not denied or disputed that an electrical connections granted in favour of the brother of the petitioner were in his individual name - Petitioner also did not suppress the fact that upon constitution of a partnership firm in the name of M/s. Gulraarg Refrigeration, Ice Factory was being run by it - Petitioner further has brought on records that his brother Mohd. Qaiser Zaman surrendered the electrical connection which has been accepted - Respondents have also not denied or disputed the statements made by the petitioner to the effect that the petitioners brother had under taken to pay all legal duos and on the basis of the said undertaking the surrender of electrical connection by him was accepted.

Fact of the Case:

Petitioner applied for a fresh electrical connection in his own name after his brother surrendered the electrical connection which was in his individual name. The Electrical Executive Engineer put unreasonable pre-conditions for grant of electrical connection in his favour.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that a distinction has to be made between an application for re-connection and an application for grant of fresh connection by a person. The court also held that the respondents have not denied or disputed that an electrical connections granted in favour of the brother of the petitioner were in his individual name. The petitioner also did not suppress the fact that upon constitution of a partnership firm in the name of M/s. Gulraarg Refrigeration, Ice Factory was being run by it. The petitioner further has brought on records that his brother Mohd. Qaiser Zaman surrendered the electrical connection which has been accepted. The respondents have also not denied or disputed the statements made by the petitioner to the effect that the petitioners brother had under taken to pay all legal duos and on the basis of the said undertaking the surrender of electrical connection by him was accepted.

Issues: Whether the conditions precedent put by the Electrical Executive Engineer for grant of fresh electrical connection are legal.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the provisions of Clause (6) of the Ist Schedule appended to the Indian Electricity Act, which enjoins an obligation to grant electrical connection to any person upon requisition made in this regard but subject to the terms and conditions mentioned therein. The court also relied on the decision of a Division Bench of this Court in Sugam Packaging Pvt, Ltd. V/s. Bihar State Electricity Board CWJC No. 5358 disposed of on 22-7-1992, wherein it was held that the electrical dues are personal dues of the consumer and the same does not run with the electrical connection.

Final Decision: The court allowed the application and directed the respondents to grant a fresh connection to the petitioner in accordance with law.

Judgment

S.B.Sinha and Narayan Roy JJ.

1. In this application the petitioner has prayed for a direction upon the respondents to grant electrical connection to him. and for issuance of an appropriate writ for quashing the directions of the Electrical Executive Engineer vide memo No. 944, dated 21-6-1993 as contained in Annexure 7 to the writ application.

2. The fact of the matter lies in a very narrow compass.

3. Mohd, Qaiser Zaraan, brother of the petitioner had applied before respondent No. 1 for grant of electrical connection and pursuant thereto an agreement dated 2-11-1978 was entered into by and between respondent No. 1 and the said applicant. Initially, a connected load of 35 H. P. was granted which was lateron increased to 97 H. P, Another agreement was catered into on or about 9-3-1992 whereby respondent No. 1 was agreed to supply to Qaiser Zaman for running an Ice Plant with a connected load of 8 H. P. According to the petitioner the said connections were taken by his brother in his individual capacity. On or about 9-9-1979 the petitioner along with his other brothers and father constituted a partnership- firm for running a business of Clod Storage. According to the petitioner all along the aforementioned Qaiser Zaman continued to treat the said electrical connection as his own Allegedly, serious disputes and differences arose between the partners of the said firm. The petitioner filed a Title Suit No. 47 of 1991 in the Court of Sub-Judge I, Ranchi for dissolution of the firm and for rendition of the account. According to the petitioner the said Qaiser Zaman filed two applications dated 22-2-1993 surrendering his electrical connections bearing consumer Nos. M-1324 and M-1378. He, however, gave an undertaking to pay the dues which may be found payable as also other legal charges to the respondent Board. Pursuant to the said applications, the electrical connection was disconnected on 2-3-1993. According to the petitioner the aforementioned steps have been taken by Qaisor Zaman in a vindictive manner in order to put the petitioner to loss. The petitioner filed a writ petition in this Court being CWJC No. 923 of 1993 praying for a direction upon the respondents to reconnect the aforementioned two electrical connections. The said Qaiser Zamac who was respondent No. 4 in the said petition filed a counter affidavit oppnosing the prayer of the petitioner in his application has quoted paragraphs 8, 15 and 16 from his counter affidavit.

The petitioner thereafter tiled an application for fresh electrical connection in the name of Gulmare Refrigeration on 29-3-1993, A reminder was also sent by the petitioner on 9-4-1993. By a letter dated 15-4-1993, the Electrical Executive Engineer however, put unreasonable pre-conditions for grant of electrical connection in his favour. The petitioner thereafter filed a writ application before this Court being CWJC No. 1513 of 1993 (R). In the said writ application also Mohd. Qaiser Zaman raised objection. According to the petitioner although the said objection was totally unfounded but in order to obviate hurdles the petitioner made an application for a new electrical connection in his own name as a result whereof the aforementioned CWJC No. 1513 of 1993 (R) was disposed of by this Court by an order dated 20-5-1993 as contained in Annexure-5 to the writ application whereby the concerned authorities were directed to consider the application of the petitioner and pass orders within three weeks. On 26-5-1993, an application was filed by respondent No, 4 requesting him to grant a fresh connection, a copy whereof is contained in Annexure-6 to the writ application. The petitioner by a letter dated 31-5-1993 also requested the General Manager-cum-Chief Engineer, Area Electricity Board to look into the matter as the matter was unnecessarily lingering. However, by a letter dated 21-6-1993, as contained in Annexure-7 to the writ application the Electrical Executive Engineer put the following five pre-con





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top