SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Pat) 405

AFTAB ALAM
Amalgamated Drugs And Pharmaceuticals Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

1. Petitioner No. 1 in this application is an industrial consumer of electrical energy; it gets supply from the Bihar State Electricity Board (the Board, for short) in terms of the High Tension Agreement, in the statutory form, which the petitioner had been obliged to execute as a pre-condition for getting its electrical connection. In this application it questions the right of the Board to demand the minimum guaranteed charges in terms of clause 4 of the agreement and seeks an appropriate writ or direction quashing the annual minimum guarantee bills as contained in Annexure 3 series. It also seeks quashing of the disconnection notice, dated 12-11-1984, a photo copy of which is to be found at Annexure-5, served on it for non-payment of the minimum guarantee bills.

2. This is an application of the year, 1986; it has been awaiting hearing by this Court for the past seven years. In the mean while, in several other cases, this Court and the Supreme Court have had occasions to make pronouncements on this question and the law relating to the minimum guaranteed charges now rests with the Supreme Court decision in the case of Bihar State Electricity Board V/s. M/ s. Dhanawat Rice O































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top