SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Pat) 176

R.M.PRASAD, NAGENDRA RAI
Gopi Krishna Pathak And Dhirendra Prasad Singh – Appellant
Versus
Ranchi University – Respondent


Judgment

R.M.Prasad, J.

1. All the three writ applications have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment/ order as the questions involved are identical as also the facts are; more or less, similar.

2. In the said writ applications the grievance of the petitioners is, that their salary with effect from August, 1991October, 1991 hat been withheld by the respondents without any valid reason and-thus the action; at the respondents in this regard is wholly unjustified. C. W. J. C. No. 873 of 1992 (R), a further prayer has been made for quashing of the; order dated 18-10-1991 issued by the Registrar, Ranchi University (respondent No. 3) whereby he has issued direction to the Principal of Markham Commerce College, Hazaribagh not to make payment to such teaching and non-teaching staff whose names do not figure in the list approved by the Government and the consequential order of the Principal, as contained in Annexure 6; stopping the payment of salary of the petitioners of the said case. In C. W. J, C. No. 837 of 1992 (K), the petitioners have also prayed for quashing of the orders dated 3-1-1992, 18-1-1962 and 20-11-1992, as contained in Annexures 6, 5 and 8, r















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top