R.M.PRASAD, NAGENDRA RAI
Gopi Krishna Pathak And Dhirendra Prasad Singh – Appellant
Versus
Ranchi University – Respondent
R.M.Prasad, J.
1. All the three writ applications have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment/ order as the questions involved are identical as also the facts are; more or less, similar.
2. In the said writ applications the grievance of the petitioners is, that their salary with effect from August, 1991October, 1991 hat been withheld by the respondents without any valid reason and-thus the action; at the respondents in this regard is wholly unjustified. C. W. J. C. No. 873 of 1992 (R), a further prayer has been made for quashing of the; order dated 18-10-1991 issued by the Registrar, Ranchi University (respondent No. 3) whereby he has issued direction to the Principal of Markham Commerce College, Hazaribagh not to make payment to such teaching and non-teaching staff whose names do not figure in the list approved by the Government and the consequential order of the Principal, as contained in Annexure 6; stopping the payment of salary of the petitioners of the said case. In C. W. J, C. No. 837 of 1992 (K), the petitioners have also prayed for quashing of the orders dated 3-1-1992, 18-1-1962 and 20-11-1992, as contained in Annexures 6, 5 and 8, r
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.