SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Pat) 193

R.N.SAHAY, P.K.DEB
Kamlesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

1. These two criminal miscellaneous applications have been referred to Division Bench for consideration. The questions that arise for consideration are as. to whether in spite of the limitation imposed under Sec. 37(l)(b) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act, 1961 (hereinafter to be referred to as the said Act) with regard to grant of bail an accused who is booked under Sec. 20 of the Act is entitled to bail if the stringent measures and formalities incorporated in the Act for arrest and seizure is not literally complied.

2. It is now settled by the decision of the Supreme Court in Narcotics Control Bureau V/s. Kishan Lall, that provision of Sec. 37 of the said Act being in negative terms limiting the scope of applicability of the provision of the Code of Criminal Procedure regarding bail, the power of the High Court under Sec. 439, Cr. P. C. are circumscribed by Sec. 37 of the Act. The Supreme Court had no occasion to consider the question whether breach of various safeguard provided in the Act in the matter of arrest etc. will render the arrest non est entitling the detenu to bail. This aspect of the matter has been considered by several High Courts.

3. Th









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top