SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Pat) 624

NAGENDRA RAI, O.N.ASTHANA
Ratan Lal Rai – Appellant
Versus
Sheo Kumar Kamalia – Respondent


Judgment

Nagendra Rai, J.

1. -as the common questions of law arise in both the cases they are being disposed of by this commorr judgment.

2. The tenants petitioners have filed the revision applications under proviso to Sec.14 (8)of the Bihar Buildings (Lease, rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1982 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) against the judgments passed by the Courts below decreeing the plaintiffs-respondents suits for eviction on the ground of their personal necessity.

3. In Civil Revision No.1519/91 the petitioner has filed the revision against the judgment dated 11th June, 1991 passed by the Additional Munsif 1st, Patna in title suit no.63/1985.

4. In Civil Revision No.1876/93 the petitioner has filed the revision against the judgment dated 11th September, 1993 passed by the Munsif frd Patna in eviction suit no.11/1990.

5. Both the suits have been disposed of under the special procedure provided under Sec.14 of the Act. Civil Revision No.1519/91

6. The case of the plaintiff-opposite party Sheo Kumar Kamalia is that the suit premises being one Kita Old House in a delapidated and old condition with land measuring 29 Karis bearing holding no.49 (Old), 55 (new) Municipal Surve







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top